Call us at 312-767-3900

Untitled---2023-11-16T095446.323.jpgData privacy laws have become increasingly important in today's digital age. With the rise of global business transactions and the transfer of personal data across borders, it is crucial for companies to understand when disputes may arise and how data privacy laws in different countries can impact these disputes. By understanding the implications of data privacy laws and the ways mediation can be used to address these concerns, the parties involved in international business disputes can take steps to resolve these issues successfully. They can do so with the help of an attorney who can provide mediation services while addressing complex data privacy concerns.

The Impact of Data Privacy Laws

Data privacy laws can vary from country to country, with some jurisdictions having stricter regulations than others. When businesses operate internationally, they must navigate through a complex web of different legal frameworks that govern the collection, storage, and transfer of personal data.

In the event of a dispute between two or more parties involved in an international business transaction, data privacy laws can significantly affect the resolution process. Here are some key ways in which data privacy laws impact international business disputes:


United States B2B Data Privacy Dispute Resolution ProfessionalThe California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) has addressed data privacy issues for the state's residents since 2020. It was amended by the California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA), which went into effect on January 1, 2023. These laws have placed requirements on businesses that collect, store, process, or transfer data related to California residents. One aspect of the law that people may not be aware of involves B2B data privacy, and businesses will need to understand the requirements that will apply when they handle data related to other businesses that are located in California or employ California residents.

How CCPA/CPRA Addresses Data Related to B2B Contacts

When the CCPA was initially passed, it included an exception for B2B data. However, following the implementation of the CPRA, this exception was eliminated, and the CCPA now regulates data about B2B contacts. These contacts may include any personnel working for a California business, including owners, officers, directors, managers, employees, and contractors, as well as a business's vendors, suppliers, or customers.

B2B contacts will have the same rights as consumers in California. Specifically, they will have the right to know what data about them is being collected, the right to refuse to have their data shared with other parties, and the right to limit the use or disclosure of sensitive personal information. They will also have the right to correct inaccurate information or delete personal information that has been collected.


IL dispute attorneyThere are a variety of situations where disputes may arise regarding the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI). The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) ensures that people's private information will be kept confidential when they receive medical treatment. However, this can sometimes present difficulties for medical providers who need to seek payment for the services provided to patients. When disputes arise regarding whether a provider improperly disclosed a patient's PHI, it is important for the parties involved to understand how the laws may apply in these situations.

HIPAA Rules for Communicating With People Other Than Patients

In most cases, HIPAA prohibits the disclosure of protected health information unless a provider receives written permission from a patient. However, HIPAA's Privacy Rule does allow providers or people or organizations they employ, such as collection agencies, to disclose PHI when necessary to obtain payments for health care services that were provided to patients.

A provider may contact people other than the patient to pursue payment, such as the person's spouse or others who handle their financial affairs, as well as insurance companies or payment providers. For instance, if a person had paid for a service with a credit card, and they later disputed that charge, the provider may contact the credit card company and provide evidence that the services were provided to the patient. By providing information to show that the charge was valid, the provider may be able to resolve the dispute and receive payments for services performed. The Privacy Rule does not place any limits on parties to whom disclosures may be made, so providers are allowed to make reasonable, necessary disclosures to collect payments.


Technology Dispute ResolutionAs technology advances and continues to permeate various aspects of our lives, it comes as no surprise that many people and companies have turned to artificial intelligence (AI) to assist in the resolution of legal disputes. One such AI tool that has garnered much attention in this regard is ChatGPT. Known for its ability to generate text in natural language, ChatGPT has garnered interest as a potential alternative for dispute resolution, and other platforms have also been developed that have been specifically designed to aid in these cases. However, as with any new technology, there are ethical concerns to address, especially when it comes to something as sensitive as resolving disputes.

Ethical Issues Related to ChatGPT

One of the key concerns regarding the use of ChatGPT and other AI programs for dispute resolution is the accuracy of the programs' outputs. While AI has shown great promise in certain areas, it is not infallible. The information generated by these systems is sometimes incorrect. Legal disputes require a significant level of precision and nuance, and errors could result in unjust outcomes. It is crucial to ensure that the program is thoroughly tested for accuracy, and information generated through ChatGPT or other programs should be verified by a person who has knowledge of the issues being addressed.

There are also concerns related to bias. While AI has the potential to be neutral, this is only the case if a system has been programmed correctly. If there are any implicit biases in the programming or training data, these biases will be reflected in the system's output.

Back to Top